Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation between Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns in Primary Mandibular Molars A Randomized Controlled Trial
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
newlineBACKGROUND: Dental caries is one of the most common diseases of the
newlineoral cavity. Restoration of the decayed tooth followed by full coronal
newlinerestorations remained as one of the treatment options. Preformed stainless
newlinesteel crowns are the widely practiced full coverage restorations but are unable
newlineto satisfy the esthetic demands. To address this issue, various esthetic
newlinecrowns have been developed among which zirconia crowns are known for
newlinetheir superior durability, biocompatibility and esthetic appearance.
newlineAIM: To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic success of the
newlinenewly introduced Kids-e-zirconia crowns against the SSC in primary
newlinemandibular molars using split mouth randomised trials.
newlineMATERIALS AND METHODS: Using split mouth study, stainless steel crown
newline(n=19) and Kids-e-Zirconia (n=19) crown were given bilaterally to the same
newlinepatient. The clinical performance was assessed via oral hygiene, gingival
newlinehealth, tooth wear, marginal adaptation and surface roughness. Through
newlineradiographic means, quality of the crown and interproximal bone level was
newline9
newlineevaluated at the baseline (at the time of the crown cementation) with a 3
newlinemonth follow-up.
newlineRESULTS: At the baseline level, OHI scores differ when compared between
newlinethe crowns at baseline level and after 3 months they were significantly
newlinedifferent from each other (p=0.02), with zirconia crowns being superior to SSC
newlinein terms of oral hygiene. Gingival health showed a mild difference between the
newlinetwo groups, however it was not of any significant level (p=0.08). Marginal
newlineadaptation and surface roughness showed no difference at the baseline level
newlinethroughout the follow up period. SSC and zirconia demonstrated similar tooth
newlinewear in our study, with longer duration of follow up. Interproximal bone level
newlinewas similar between the two groups.
newlineCONCLUSION: Clinical performance of zirconia and stainless steel crowns
newlinewas equally good.