Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of GMHAT PC Critical Care Pathways and Contemporary Care of mental disorders in improving the Quality of Care and Satisfaction among patients with Common Mental Disorders
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Abstract
newlinea
newlineABSTRACT
newlineTitle
newlineComparative evaluation of the efficacy of GMHAT-PC critical care pathways and contemporary care of mental disorders in improving the quality of care and satisfaction among patients with common mental disorders.
newlineBackground
newlineMental health care is a major concern in tertiary care hospital, India, but the lack of trained professionals limits access to care. In this study, it is been evaluated the efficacy of a Global Mental Health Assessment Tool, Critical Care Pathways in improving quality of care and satisfaction among patients with common mental disorders by providing training for staff nurses in tertiary care hospital Maharashtra, India.
newlineAim
newlineand#61623; To evaluate the efficacy of GMHAT-PC critical care pathways in improving towards quality of life and satisfaction among common mental disorders.
newlineand#61623; Staff nurses utilize the GMHAT-PC critical care pathways in providing patients care and improve the standards.
newlineObjectives
newline1.To establish the feasibility of implementing the Global Mental Health Assessment Tool -PC critical care pathways.
newline2.To find out the baseline knowledge and skills of staff nurses regarding implementation of GMHAT-PC critical care pathways to patients with common mental disorders.
newline3.To evaluate the efficacy of training of staff nurses regarding use of GMHAT-PC care pathways for individualized care to patients with common mental disorders.
newline4.To assess the quality of care and satisfaction level among the patients with common mental disorders before intervention in both groups.
newline5.To evaluate the efficacy of GMHAT-PC critical care pathways in improving the quality of care and patient satisfaction every fifteen days for 3 consecutive times.
newline6.To compare the quality of care and patient satisfaction in both groups and with pretest values.
newline7.To correlate the quality of care with patient satisfaction in both groups before and after the intervention.
newlineAbstract
newlineb
newlineMethods
newlineThe study enrolled 30 staff nurses from tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra and 200 patients suffering with common mental diso