Construction of dominant geopolitical discourse in US foreign policy a case study of central Asia since 2001

dc.contributor.guideChaturvedi, Sanjay
dc.coverage.spatialPolitical Science
dc.creator.researcherAwasthi, Chandan
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-26T09:13:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-26T09:13:05Z
dc.date.awardedn.d.
dc.date.completed2018
dc.date.registered26/09/2006
dc.description.abstractThis thesis, taking Central Asia since 2001 as a case study, and deploying discourse analysis as its key research method, sought to examine the ways in which dominant geopolitical discourse on Central Asia has been constructed in the U.S. foreign policy against the backdrop of competing geopolitical visions of the leading institutions and intellectuals of the statecraft. The key argument put forward in the thesis has been that dominant geopolitical discourse on Central Asia in the U.S. foreign policy is what the leading institutions and intellectuals of statecraft are making of it in discursive practices. The analysis attempted in the thesis has shown that such geopolitical visions of the leading institutions and intellectuals of statecraft remain fluid, especially in times of geopolitical transition and reordering. Consequently it becomes rather difficult to exercise options or choices with regard to how Central Asia could possibly be approached, understood and analyzed, There is therefore no final, uncontested narrative of what Central Asia truly is or would truly become in the U.S. foreign policy in the years and decades ahead. newlineThis thesis has also made an attempt to evolve an analytical framework to understand the various factors and forces that help construct a dominant geopolitical discourse out of various competingnarratives. It has also examined the same construct by applying an alternative perspective . This study has shown that the so called national interest of the United States in Central Asia is in fact a multi-layered and complex category. The thesis argues that the dominant geopolitical discourse in the U.S. foreign policy in Central Asia under Bush since 2001 was constructed amidst plurality of visions in the statecraft. The War on terror discourse provided the non-Eurasian U.S. a larger rationale and opportunity for enlarging its geopolitical and military-strategic interests in Central Asia newline
dc.description.noteBibliography p.264-313
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialCD
dc.format.dimensions-
dc.format.extentxi,313p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/255287
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisher.institutionDepartment of Political Science
dc.publisher.placeChandigarh
dc.publisher.universityPanjab University
dc.relation-
dc.rightsuniversity
dc.source.universityUniversity
dc.subject.keywordCentral Asia
dc.subject.keywordDiscourse Analysis
dc.subject.keywordGeopolitical Discourse
dc.subject.keywordGeopolitics
dc.subject.keywordInternational Relations
dc.subject.keywordSocial Sciences,Social Sciences General,Political Science
dc.subject.keywordU.S. Foreign Policy
dc.titleConstruction of dominant geopolitical discourse in US foreign policy a case study of central Asia since 2001
dc.title.alternative-
dc.type.degreePh.D.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 17
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_title.pdf
Size:
5.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Attached File
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
02_certificate.pdf
Size:
799.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
03_acknowledgement.pdf
Size:
10.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
04_contents.pdf
Size:
106.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05_maps.pdf
Size:
106.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: