Freedom of Religion in India A Study With Special Reference to Religious Conversions
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
India is a country with a long and complex religious history in which the religious freedom carries utmost prominence. The religious freedom is a sensitive and controversial issue and becomes even more complex when it causes religious conversions. The religious conversions have become increasingly politicized, contributing to social polarization and religious tensions. Additionally, interfaith marriages,spiritualdissatisfaction,andsocio-economicfactorscontributesignificantlyto conversion decisions, while movements like Ghar Wapsi have intensified debates over reconversion practices.
newlineThe complex constitutional, legal, and socio-political dimensions of religious freedom and conversions in India, addressing the delicate balance between individual liberty and State regulation in a pluralistic democracy. The constitutional framework governing religious conversions, analyzes the varied reasons behind such conversions, evaluates judicial responses, and assesses the broader societal implications of conversion practices in contemporary India.
newlineThe legal analysis of State-level anti-conversion legislations reveals that Indian legal system at state level have sufficient and effective mechanism for protecting and upholding religious freedom while providing effective remedy in case of forced conversions. States such as Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh have implemented stringent regulations requiring prior notification to authorities before conversion, while othersmaintainnosuchrestrictions,resultingincontradictoryjudicialinterpretationsand varied enforcement mechanisms. The absence of clear definitions for quotforce,quot quotfraud,quot and quotinducementquot in anti-conversion laws creates legal uncertainties and bureaucratic obstacles for voluntary conversions.
newlineJudicial analysis reveals inconsistent court interpretations, with some rulings emphasizing individual liberty while others reinforce state regulatory control.