A Study Of Governance Of Oil Spill Disasters In Indian Waters
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Marine oil spill disasters may not touch everybody all the time, but when they do, the impact could be
newlinelasting, if the national structure for their governance is ill- conceived. Incidentally, the concept of oil
newlinespill governance itself has not received a lot of scholarly attention, possibly owing to its episodic
newlinenature, though some scholars observe that oil spill research is a rapidly expanding field with a growth
newlinerate faster than that of science as a whole.
newlineThe objective of this dissertation is to understand the relationship between governance of oil spill
newlinedisasters in a State and the corresponding potential for externalities alongside the transposition of
newlineexternalities by hegemonies onto other States through the structure of international regimes.
newlineThe study spans three interdependent levels t he regime, programmes and mechanisms at the
newlinei
newlinenternational level; the law, policy and governance at the national level and the coastal State level, as
newlineapplicable; and norms, practices and implementation at the local organisational level.
newlineThe research setting comprises States party to the relevant international regimes including the
newlineMARPOL Convention, OPRC Convention, and IOPC fund, tanker shipping in the Arabian Sea, ports
newlineand port facilities, single point moorings, and offshore installations and stakeholders across
newlinegovernment and industry.
newlineThis dissertation is guided by the various theoretical approaches to governance and its strong interplay
newlinewith regime theory and particularly focused on the systematic externalities approach. Critical
newlineexploration of the various disaster frameworks and their limitations yielded the conceptual framework
newlinefor the research and its operationalisation.
newlineThe empirical study focuses on agents that contribute to negative externality and includes both, the
newlineproviders and receivers of oil spill governance comprising of the IMO and national regulators on the
newlineone hand and the oil and shipping industry, and ports on the other.
newlineA specifically designed Oil Spill Governance Questionnaire was administered to determine the
newlinereadiness of the ports and oil companies, their willingness to pay and discern their views on oil spill
newlinegovernance at national level. The subjective questions were administered to the providers of oil spill
newlinegovernance. Focus Group Discussion and Personal Interviews were built on the questionnaire survey
newlineto make inferences on the state of oil spill governance at the company level, coastal state level, and
newlinethe national level.
newlineThe study is pertinent since an account of how externalities are generated and sustained is needed to
newlinecomplete a theory of them, given that in their absence, the externalities cannot be explained. The
newlinestudy argues that at the more fundamental level, negative externalities are a product of not merely
newlineinstitutional failure at the national level, as portrayed by contemporary studies in economics, but a
newlineconsequence of hegemonic actions of a group, or club, of nations working in cohort at the
newlineinternational level.
newlineKey words: Governance, externality, regime, disasters, oil spill
newline