Certain investigations on performance enhancement of vehicular adhoc network based on traffic scenarios
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The route-discovery technique in VANET is problematic owing to
newlinethe strong network design, which makes communication difficult in both the
newlineuplink and downlink directions. The fuzzy strategy and recital optimization are
newlineused to offer effective connectivity in vehicular adhoc networks (VANETs) in
newlineorder to offer high security and authenticated optimal route.
newlineIn recent years, the popularity of VANET in wireless intelligent
newlinetransportation systems has significantly increased. It is difficult to determine
newlinethe quickest path between the source and the target in a VANET traffic system.
newlineLonger routes feature increased network overhead, more expensive
newlineconnections, more path failures, and worse routing efficiency. Identifying the
newlineshortest route in optimization, often known as the Travelling Salesman Problem
newline(TSP) and traffic congestion, is a well-known combinatorial optimization
newlinechallenge with various practical applications. To improve routing efficiency,
newlinethe HACOSMO (Hybrid-Ant Colony Optimization with Spider Monkey
newlineOptimization) system s recommended meta-heuristic approach finds the
newlineshortest path using distance and traffic based principles. The simulation NS-2
newlineoutcomes focused on the efficiency of the proposed method beats the other
newlineexisting methods like ACO, GRACO, OACO, and IDBACOR in terms of
newlineoverhead, throughput, latency, packet failure, and message transmission ratio.
newlineAccording to HACOSMO, routing overhead is 8% to 11% under IDBACOR,
newline10% to 14% under GRACO,19% to 31% under OACO, and 24% to 37% under
newlineACO for a variety of vehicle counts and speed ranges. When compared to
newlineIDBACOR, the proposed method enhances throughput by 3% to 7%, 6% to 8%
newlinewhen compared to GRACO, 11% to 15% when compared to OACO, and 16%
newlineto 25% when compared to ACO.
newline