A Hindu Daughters Coparcener Rights A Critical Review

dc.contributor.guideWagh, Rajlakshmi
dc.coverage.spatial
dc.creator.researcherNalawade, Gouri Sachinkumar
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-07T08:23:59Z
dc.date.available2026-01-07T08:23:59Z
dc.date.awarded2025
dc.date.completed2025
dc.date.registered2019
dc.description.abstractUnder traditional Hindu law, the concept of coparcenary was strictly patriarchal, conferring property rights exclusively upon male members of a joint Hindu family. Daughters were excluded from coparcenary status and denied any birthright in ancestral property. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, while codifying succession laws, largely retained this inequality by continuing the male-centric framework of inheritance. As a result, gender disparity in property rights remained deeply entrenched in both law and practice. newlineThe Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 marked a transformative development by recognizing daughters as coparceners by birth, granting them rights equal to those of sons in ancestral property. This amendment aimed to align personal law with constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination. However, despite its progressive intent, the amendment has not fully achieved substantive equality. Judicial interpretation of the amendment has been inconsistent, particularly concerning its retrospective application, pending partitions, and the rights of daughters born prior to 2005. Such conflicting rulings have created legal uncertainty and practical difficulties in enforcement. newlineMoreover, while Section 8 of the Act adopts a gender-neutral approach in intestate succession, Section 15 governing the succession of a Hindu female s property continues to operate unequally, often diverting her property away from her natal family. This inconsistency reflects the persistence of patriarchal assumptions within the statutory framework. newlineThis thesis critically examines the evolution of Hindu daughters coparcenary rights, analyses legislative intent and judicial responses, and highlights existing gaps in the law. It concludes that although the 2005 amendment represents a significant step toward gender justice, further legislative reform and doctrinal clarity are necessary to ensure true equality in property rights for Hindu daughters. newline
dc.description.note
dc.format.accompanyingmaterialNone
dc.format.dimensions
dc.format.extentAll Pages
dc.identifier.researcherid
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10603/686376
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisher.institutionFaculty of Law
dc.publisher.placePune
dc.publisher.universityBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University
dc.relation
dc.rightsuniversity
dc.source.universityUniversity
dc.subject.keywordLaw
dc.subject.keywordSocial Sciences
dc.subject.keywordSocial Sciences General
dc.titleA Hindu Daughters Coparcener Rights A Critical Review
dc.title.alternative
dc.type.degreePh.D.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 14
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_title.pdf.pdf
Size:
183.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Attached File
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
02_prelim pages.pdf.pdf
Size:
852.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
03_contents.pdf.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
04_abstract.pdf
Size:
144.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05_chapter1.pdf.pdf
Size:
860.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections