Action plan preparation Medak Nala and impact assessment katangidda nala of watersheds in gulbarga district using remote sensing and gis technologies
Loading...
Date
item.page.authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Action plan preparation of Medak Nala watershed and impact assessment of
newlineKatangidda Nala watershed were carried out using remote sensing and GIS technologies.
newlineSatellite data of IRS- 1C/1D for two seasons representing rabi (December 8 and 10, 2000
newlinePAN + LISS III merged) and summer (March 15, 2001 LISS III) were used for preparing
newlinethematic maps and suggesting action plans for management of natural resources in Medak
newlineNala watershed. Impact assessment of IWDP programme in Katangidda Nala watershed was
newlinedone using IRS 1C/1D data of LISS III image of December 11, 1997 (pre-treatment) and
newlineNovember 15, 2002 (post-treatment).
newlineThe water and agriculture resources action plans of Medak Nala watershed were
newlineprepared by integrating the thematic maps such as land use/land cover, soil resource
newlineinventory, hydro-geomorphology, slope etc. The results indicated that the present land use of
newlinethe watershed (5,169 ha, 42.58%) is under kharif crop followed by rabi crop area (2,814 ha,
newline23.18%) and land with scrub (2,280 ha, 18.78%). The 20 soil series of the watershed were
newlineclassified under Inceptisols, Alfisols, Vertisols and Entisols.
newlineResults of impact assessment of Katangidda Nala watershed revealed that the area
newlineunder agriculture crops and forest land were increased by 671 ha (5.7%) and 1,414 ha
newline(11.94%) respectively. This is due to the fact that more areas of waste lands and fallow lands
newlinewere brought into cultivation. The vegetation vigour of the area was classified into three
newlineclasses using NDVI. Substantial increase in the area under high and low biomass levels was
newlineobserved (502 ha and 19 ha respectively). The benefit-cost analysis indicated that the use of
newlineremote sensing and GIS was cheaper by 2.2 times than that of conventional methods.
newline